Barack Obama's Nuclear Policy : Based on the 2010 Nuclear Posture Review ( http://opendata.mofa.go.kr/mofapub/resource/Publication/11731 ) at Linked Data

Property Value
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • Barack Obama's Nuclear Policy : Based on the 2010 Nuclear Posture Review
skos:prefLabel
  • Barack Obama's Nuclear Policy : Based on the 2010 Nuclear Posture Review
skos:altLabel
  • Barack Obama's Nuclear Policy : Based on the 2010 Nuclear Posture Review
mofadocu:relatedCountry
bibo:abstract
  • Barack Obama’s Nuclear Policy: 
    Based on the 2010 Nuclear Posture Review 
     
    April 19, 2010 
    KIM Hyun-wook 
    Assistant Professor 
     
    Since the election period, 
    President Obama has 
    emphasized continuously 
    pushing forward the policy 
    of non-proliferation and 
    counter-terrorism through the so-called 
    Obama-Biden plan, and his overall 
    nuclear policy consists of three 
    components: non-proliferation, disarmament 
    and the peaceful use of nuclear energy. 
    The initial materialization of his policy 
    was achieved during his Prague speech 
    delivered on April 5, 2009, and, starting 
    with Russia’s signing of the New 
    START, followed by Nuclear Security 
    Summit on April 12-13, NPT Review 
    Conference being held in May would 
    continue this process of materializing 
    President Obama’s nuclear policy.
    Therefore, both the U.S. and 
    South Korea need to come up with a 
    concrete plan for extended deterrence. 
    The U.S. clearly stated in the 2010 NPR 
    its will to provide a credible extended 
    deterrence posture and capabilities not 
    only through the use of nuclear 
    weapons but also through conventional 
    military forces and missile defense 
    system. However, South Korea is 
    currently not included in the missile 
    defense system, nor does it have a 
    concrete idea of how to deter North 
    Korea’s nuclear ambitions by using 
    conventional military forces. Japan, on 
    the other hand, is partially included in 
    the missile defense system, and such 
    situation leaves open the logical 
    possibility that the U.S. troops stationed 
    in Japan rather than those stationed in 
    South Korea might be more effective in 
    deterring North Korea. Thus, concrete measures need to be considered in the 
    future, and, in this regard, the U.S. and 
    South Korea might be required to 
    engage in discussions on specific 
    solutions to respond to such scenario.
mofadocu:category
  • 기타
mofa:relatedPerson
mofa:yearOfData
  • "2010"^^xsd:integer
mofapub:dataURL
  • "https://www.ifans.go.kr/knda/ifans/kor/pblct/PblctView.do?clCode=P08&pblctDtaSn=11731&koreanEngSe=KOR"^^xsd:anyURI
  • "https://www.ifans.go.kr/knda/ifans/kor/pblct/PblctView.do?csrfPreventionSalt=null&pblctDtaSn=11731&menuCl=P08&clCode=P08&koreanEngSe=KOR"^^xsd:anyURI
mofapub:hasAuthor
  • 김현욱
mofapub:pubDate
  • "20100531"^^xsd:integer
mofapub:pubNumber
  • 2010-08
dcterms:language
  • KOR

본 페이지는 온톨로지 데이터를 Linked Data로 발행한 것입니다.