IFR 95-6 (V.3, NO.6) Peace and Stability on the Korean Peninsula and in Northeast Asia ( http://opendata.mofa.go.kr/mofapub/resource/Publication/11246 ) at Linked Data

Property Value
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • IFR 95-6 (V.3, NO.6) Peace and Stability on the Korean Peninsula and in Northeast Asia
  • IFR 95-6 (V.3, NO.6) Peace and Stability on the Korean Peninsula and in Northeast Asia
skos:prefLabel
  • IFR 95-6 (V.3, NO.6) Peace and Stability on the Korean Peninsula and in Northeast Asia
  • IFR 95-6 (V.3, NO.6) Peace and Stability on the Korean Peninsula and in Northeast Asia
skos:altLabel
  • IFR 95-6 (V.3, NO.6) Peace and Stability on the Korean Peninsula and in Northeast Asia
  • IFR 95-6 (V.3, NO.6) Peace and Stability on the Korean Peninsula and in Northeast Asia
mofadocu:relatedCountry
bibo:abstract
  • Peace and Stability on the Korean Peninsula and in Northeast Asia: A Korean Perspective
    Byung-Hyo Choi and Seo-Hang Lee
    1995.12
    Byung-Hyo Choi: Senior Policy Coordinator for Security Affairs, Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
    Seo-Hang Lee: Research Professor and Director-General for Security & Unification Studies, Institute of Foreign Affairs and National Security.
    Introduction : Security Trends in Northeast Asia
    The end of the Cold War has certainly led to an overall improvement in the security
    environment of Northeast Asia. It has generally reduced international tension across the
    region by improving bilateral relationships among regional countries. The preoccupation
    of virtually all countries in the region with accelerating economic development and
    enhancing their economic competitiveness has encouraged them to promote cooperative
    commercial relations with their neighbors, and this has also contributed to a reduction
    of tensions. As a result, trade among Northeast Asian countries has significantly
    increased in recent years, and intra-regional interdependence is deepening year after
    year.
    However, there still remain conflicts likely to affect regional peace and security, some
    which are the legacy of the Cold War. These include the territorial dispute between
    Japan and Russia, the tensions in the Taiwan Strait, the division of the Korean peninsula
    and Pyongyang's drive to become an indigenous nuclear power. Although some
    progress has been made in defusing these potential crises, none of these problems have
    been completely resolved.
    There is also a growing agenda of nonconventional security issues in the region, issues
    that do not involve direct military deployments, but that could still give rise to the
    threat or use of force. These include the management of natural resources; the
    protection of the environment, in particular, transborder air pollution and nuclear waste
    dumping; the regulation of refugees; and the prevention of international criminal
    activities such as piracy, smuggling, drug trafficking and terrorism.
    It is also to be noted that the countries in the region have been actively engaged in
    building up their military forces. Competitive acquisition of arms are being fueled by the
    obsolescence of existing weapons stock and the general prosperity throughout the
    region. Above all, they are being stimulated by the strategic uncertainties surrounding
    the collapse of the Soviet Union and the reduction in American deployment in the region.
    Although the motivations behind the arms build-up in the region are complex and vary
    according to country, the major causes for the military arms build-up in Northeast Asia
    today no longer stem from ideological conflicts but rather from growing concern with
    strategic uncertainty and conflicting national interests, that is, the urge to protect or
    expand a sphere of influence versus the fear of losing it.
    A fragile peace was maintained in Northeast Asia during the Cold War years with the
    United States playing a pivotal role in maintaining peace and stability in the region. Its
    security commitment remains the linchpin of post-Cold War Northeast Asian peace and
    stability under the present power relations and strategic circumstances. However,
    anxieties arise over the future role of the United States in post-Cold War Northeast
    Asia.
    Probably the most serious challenge to the long-term security of the region may come
    from the internal factors. Major transformations―social, economic, and political in their
    nature―are taking place in key states in the region. The outcome of such
    transformations will determine to a large extent the nature of the future Northeast
    Asian security environment.
    The purpose of this paper is to examine the Republic of Korea's approach to peace and
    stability on the Korean peninsula and in Northeast Asia, by scrutinizing the recent
    security developments in the region.
    The Korean Peninsula: Major Security Concerns in Northeast Asia
    Three Approaches to Enhance Peace and Stability
    Conclusion
    Since the Korean peninsula still remains as one of the major places of tension in
    Northeast Asia, it is clear that promoting North-South dialogue and successfully
    managing the North Korean issue―the nuclear question and the integration of
    Pyongyang into the regional order―are the keys to preserving regional security and
    economic prosperity. In other words, without realizing denuclearization and the
    accomplishment of peace and reconciliation on the Korean peninsula and economic
    cooperation, the current state of regional security and economic interdependence
    cannot be sustained.
    The measures to enhance peace and stability and to facilitate regional cooperation on
    the Korean peninsula and Northeast Asia are open-ended. We can presume three major
    approaches―bilateral, regional and the application of global agreements―at the initial
    stage. At the moment, the most important approach is to encourage bilateral
    negotiations between the parties in direct conflict. To promote North-South direct
    negotiations, the Republic of Korea is genuinely interested in making economic
    conditions to create change in North Korea and to foster these conditions by allowing
    increased business transactions and other avenues of economic cooperation.
    While emphasizing the importance of bilateral negotiations between the two Koreas,
    however, it is not necessarily to exclude the role of external powers in the region.
    Given the political conditions surrounding the Korean peninsula, any fundamental
    change in the inter-Korean situation would, in the long run, require the support of the
    international community, particularly the United States, Japan, China and Russia. The
    four major powers in the region could support the North-South dialogue, help in the
    easing of tensions, facilitate discussion of common security concerns and possibly
    guarantee the outcomes negotiated between the two Koreas, by forming a consulative
    forum in the region.
    Source Materials
    Remarks by H.E. Mr. Gong Ro-Myung, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Korea, at the 50th Session of the General ...
    East Asia Today and Tomorrow
    AGREEMENT ON SUPPLY OF A LIGHT-WATER REACTOR PROJECT TO THE DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF KOREA BETWEEN THE KOREAN PENINSULA
mofadocu:relatedCity
mofadocu:category
  • 기타
mofa:relatedPerson
mofadocu:relatedArea
mofa:yearOfData
  • "2005"^^xsd:integer
mofapub:dataURL
  • "https://www.ifans.go.kr/knda/ifans/kor/pblct/PblctView.do?clCode=P08&pblctDtaSn=11246&koreanEngSe=KOR"^^xsd:anyURI
  • "https://www.ifans.go.kr/knda/ifans/kor/pblct/PblctView.do?csrfPreventionSalt=null&pblctDtaSn=11246&menuCl=P08&clCode=P08&koreanEngSe=KOR"^^xsd:anyURI
mofapub:hasAuthor
  • IFANS
mofapub:pubDate
  • "20050526"^^xsd:integer
dcterms:language
  • KOR

본 페이지는 온톨로지 데이터를 Linked Data로 발행한 것입니다.